Category talk:Vigilante: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
::::: Terrorists (those who destroy simply for the sake of destruction) :) whereas BL activists are freedom fighters :)  My personal position on neutrality of POV is about the same as those that banned you from Wikipedia. I am all for neutrality (as long as I agree with it).  --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:15, 3 November 2015

Activist, vigilante is POV

These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __meco (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Vigilante - "a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate." There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --Etenne (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __meco (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --Etenne (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __meco (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Terrorists (those who destroy simply for the sake of destruction) :) whereas BL activists are freedom fighters :) My personal position on neutrality of POV is about the same as those that banned you from Wikipedia. I am all for neutrality (as long as I agree with it). --Etenne (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)