Talk:BoyLovers' codes of ethics: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
IN the section, "Another BoyLovers Response to Dragonlover's code of ethics" who is user4 quoting? Or is this simply an editorial added to an encyclopedia article? --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 11:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | IN the section, "Another BoyLovers Response to Dragonlover's code of ethics" who is user4 quoting? Or is this simply an editorial added to an encyclopedia article? --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 11:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
::User4 is quoting a ''very experienced'' BoyLover's experiences with a large number of boys. Dragonlover's "code of ethics" ''is an editorial'', (and it ''is'' in an "encyclopedia" article), but it seems that Dragonlover is editorializing on the basis of little or no real-life experience with boys. Personally, I would be willing to bet money that he has very little or no real-life experience on which to base his personal opinions (which he has done in an "encyclopedia" article) regarding what he believes "real" BoyLover's relationships with boys are like. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 11:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 10 May 2016
"The" Boylove Code of Ethics leads one to believe that only one code of ethics for BoyLovers exists. Is this true? Can you provide a reference for that? Otherwise, shouldn't it be "A" Boylove Code of Ethics or "One" Boylove Code of Ethics? Thanks. User4 (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you think that it suggests or leads one "to believe that only one code of ethics for BoyLovers exists"? If you read the narrative it says that more exist and links to two others? --Etenne
14:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC) -
- Perhaps due to the use of the article "The," the title is misleading? Have you recently reviewed the usage of the article "the" as opposed to the use of "a" or "one"? I think that if you did, then you would then better understand the reason for my comment. Thanks. User4 (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- On third thought, maybe the article would better be titled "BoyLovers' codes of ethics," and then written up as such. There have been a large number of "codes of ethics" written up for and about BoyLovers. What do you think? User4 (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems reasonable. --Etenne 20:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems reasonable. --Etenne
- On third thought, maybe the article would better be titled "BoyLovers' codes of ethics," and then written up as such. There have been a large number of "codes of ethics" written up for and about BoyLovers. What do you think? User4 (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps due to the use of the article "The," the title is misleading? Have you recently reviewed the usage of the article "the" as opposed to the use of "a" or "one"? I think that if you did, then you would then better understand the reason for my comment. Thanks. User4 (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
IN the section, "Another BoyLovers Response to Dragonlover's code of ethics" who is user4 quoting? Or is this simply an editorial added to an encyclopedia article? --Etenne 11:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- User4 is quoting a very experienced BoyLover's experiences with a large number of boys. Dragonlover's "code of ethics" is an editorial, (and it is in an "encyclopedia" article), but it seems that Dragonlover is editorializing on the basis of little or no real-life experience with boys. Personally, I would be willing to bet money that he has very little or no real-life experience on which to base his personal opinions (which he has done in an "encyclopedia" article) regarding what he believes "real" BoyLover's relationships with boys are like. User4 (talk) 11:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
