Talk:Sex offender risk assessment: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
m (Etenne moved page Talk:Sex offender risk assessment to User talk:Lysander/Sex offender risk assessment without leaving a redirect) |
(→Wow, there's hardly anything there: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | :::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Yes, it does have relevance. A lot of boylovers end up going through risk assessments. It's a stub now, but it has potential to become a featured article if expanded and improved enough. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ::::Yes, it does have relevance. A lot of boylovers end up going through risk assessments. It's a stub now, but it has potential to become a featured article if expanded and improved enough. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Wow, there's hardly anything there == | |||
I'd forgotten this article was so short. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 20:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:31, 15 August 2015
This belongs in a general article on Sex Offenders or Sex Offenses. I see little or no reason for an article containing so little information relevant to BoyLovers to be a "standalone" article at BoyWiki.
- Please ask yourself before hitting the save button
Wow, there's hardly anything there
I'd forgotten this article was so short. Lysander (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
