Template talk:Cite news: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(→Archive facility: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Archive facility== | ==Archive facility== | ||
The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: <code>|deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= </code>. Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC) | The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: <code>|deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= </code>. Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I unprotected this template so you can edit it. It you want to edit a protected template, all you have to do is ask :)--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 15:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:47, 9 November 2015
Archive facility
The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: |deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= . Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __meco (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
