User talk:User4/BoyWiki's attitude towards saving BoyLovers from prison: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
(Created page with "You know in the time it took you to write this, you could have put that effort in to improving Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16. You would already be...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
You know in the time it took you to write this, you could have put that effort in to improving [[Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16]]. You would already be half way through writing the intro paragraph. I really don't understand you sometimes. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
You know in the time it took you to write this, you could have put that effort in to improving [[Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16]]. You would already be half way through writing the intro paragraph. I really don't understand you sometimes. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
::What you have just claimed is '''''incorrect'''''. You said:
:::"My thought is that if it is just going to remain how it is now, then it should simply be a subsection of Spain. However if someone wanted to put in the time and effort of researching the history that lead up to this law, who the major players were in promoting this decision, who sponsored the law, etc, etc..... then it would warrant being an entry on it's own. --Etenne (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)"
::'''''which is NOT just "writing an intro paragraph" as you have just claimed.'''''
*Source of the above quote: [[Talk:Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16]]
:[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 17:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 22 June 2015

You know in the time it took you to write this, you could have put that effort in to improving Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16. You would already be half way through writing the intro paragraph. I really don't understand you sometimes. --Etenne (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

What you have just claimed is incorrect. You said:
"My thought is that if it is just going to remain how it is now, then it should simply be a subsection of Spain. However if someone wanted to put in the time and effort of researching the history that lead up to this law, who the major players were in promoting this decision, who sponsored the law, etc, etc..... then it would warrant being an entry on it's own. --Etenne (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)"
which is NOT just "writing an intro paragraph" as you have just claimed.
User4 (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)