Voodoo Molestation
Voodoo describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.[1] Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.[2] While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul. Most of the people today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking
Voodoo Molestation and US Law
In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that restitution could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by all those who have viewed the image based on the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject. It was maintained that there is a causal link between viewing an image and the "pain and suffering" of its subject. [4] However, there is no demonstrable scientific evidence which shows the existence of any psychical damage or changes to the brain structure of the subject related to the viewing or other manipulation of the image.
USA Today reported that the case stemed from Congress' passage of the Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act, which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what.... Amy, whose real name is not used in court papers, was raped and filmed at ages 8 and 9 by her uncle who served 10 years in prison for his actions ..... As a result, her lawyers argued, she could not finish college, has had trouble holding a job and will require weekly psychotherapy for the rest of her life [4] estimating that the cost of her psychotherapy would be $3.4 million.
At 17, Amy learned that the pictures he uncle took of her had gone "viral on the Internet" and had been downloaded and viewed by thousands of individuals. Doyle Randall Paroline, who possessed just two images and was sentenced in 2009 to two years in prison
Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching
Re-victimization http://www.publicengines.com/blog/2010/02/03/re-victimization-and-restitution-for-victims-of-child-pornography/
Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/
References
- ↑ The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul. Retrieved on April 27, 2014.
- ↑ Edwards, Elizabeth. Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition. Oxford University Press. Retrieved on April 27, 2014.
- ↑ http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Wolf, Richard (April 23, 2014). Justices limit restitution to victims by child porn users. USATODAY,. Retrieved on April 27, 2014.
