Boylove: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Dandelion (talk | contribs)
Modified the introduction of the article
Dandelion (talk | contribs)
Modified the text of the article
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:BLogo 930x818.png|thumb|200px|[[BLogo]]: The modern symbol of boylove.]]
[[File:BLogo 930x818.png|thumb|200px|[[BLogo]]: The modern symbol of boylove.]]


'''Boylove''', a concept that can be traced back to [[Boylove in antiquity|Classical antiquity]], is the word chosen by [[boylover]]s to describe the strong feelings of attraction and affection that adults feel towards [[boy]]s. It is semantically equivalent to the term "[[pederasty]]", which is itself derived from the combination of the Greek words ''pais'' ("boy") and ''erastēs'' ("lover"; cf. ''eros''). In ancient Greek [[Homoerotic (dictionary)|homoerotic]] poetry, the noun ''paiderastēs'' and the verb ''paiderastein'' were replaced by ''paidophilēs'' and ''paidophilein'' (synonyms from which the term "[[pedophilia]]" originates), in order to fit the elegiac metre favored for the genre.<ref>K. J. Dover, ''Greek Homosexuality''; Harvard University Press, 1989; p. 50.</ref> The word "boylove" was chosen in order to include [[Ephebophilia|ephebophiles]], to avoid the negative connotations of the modern clinical term "pedophilia", and to more accurately define the exclusive focus of the attraction: male children and adolescents.  
'''Boylove''', a concept whose origin can be traced back to [[Boylove in antiquity|Classical antiquity]], is the word chosen by [[boylover]]s to describe the strong feelings of attraction and affection that certain adults feel towards [[boy]]s. It is semantically equivalent to the term "[[pederasty]]", which is itself derived from the combination of the Greek words ''pais'' ("boy") and ''erastēs'' ("lover"; cf. ''eros''). In ancient Greek [[Homoerotic (dictionary)|homoerotic]] poetry, the noun ''paiderastēs'' and the verb ''paiderastein'' were replaced by ''paidophilēs'' and ''paidophilein'' (synonyms from which the term "[[pedophilia]]" originates), in order to fit the elegiac metre favored for the genre.<ref>K. J. Dover, ''Greek Homosexuality''; Harvard University Press, 1989; p. 50.</ref> The word "boylove" was chosen in order to be applicable to both pedophiles and [[Ephebophilia|ephebophiles]], as well as to avoid the negative connotations of the modern clinical term "pedophilia", and to more accurately define the exclusive focus of the attraction: male children and adolescents.  


Boylovers commonly assert that boylove is a natural phenomenon that has existed throughout human history, and is similar in nature to other accepted sexual orientations.  While boylove usually includes feelings of sexual and physical attraction to boys, boylove does not require, nor imply, sexual activity with boys.  Boylove can be completely platonic since the main concern of most boylovers is providing love and guidance to boys.
Boylovers commonly assert that boylove is a natural phenomenon that has existed throughout human history, fundamentally similar to currently accepted sexual orientations, a perspective they sustain by pointing out to the existence of customs of age-structured sexuality in different cultures and historical periods.  


There is debate on the nature of boylove. There are some who believe boylove is simply a noun for adults who are emotionally and physically attracted to boys and that there are no particular guidelines or requirements to being a boylover besides having the attraction and an aversion to hurting boys. Others believe boylove, in addition to the attraction, denotes a set of beliefs and values related to the treatment of boys and that one must adhere to these expectations to be considered a boylover.<ref>[[Philosophy of responsible boylove|The Philosophy of Responsible Boylove]]</ref> These values may include ideas such as boylovers should never expose boys to alcohol and drugs, that boylovers should never initiate sexual activities with boys, or even that boylovers should refrain from sex with boys in any case due to the risks involved for both parties. Universally accepted, however, is the idea that boylovers respect boys and do not hurt them. Boylove is not about [[child abuse]].
While boylove usually includes feelings of sexual and physical attraction to boys, boylove does not require, nor imply, sexual activity with boys.  Boylove can be completely platonic, since the main concern of most boylovers is providing love and guidance to boys.
 
There is debate on the nature of boylove. There are some who believe boylove is simply a noun for adults who are emotionally and physically attracted to boys and that there are no particular guidelines or requirements to being a boylover besides having the attraction and an aversion to hurting boys. Others believe boylove, in addition to the attraction, denotes a set of beliefs and values related to the treatment of boys and that one must adhere to these expectations to be considered a boylover.<ref>[[Philosophy of responsible boylove|The Philosophy of Responsible Boylove]]</ref> These values may include ideas such as boylovers should never expose boys to alcohol and drugs, that boylovers should never initiate sexual activities with boys, or even that boylovers should refrain from sex with boys in any case due to the risks involved for both parties. Universally accepted, however, is the idea that boylovers respect boys and do not hurt them. Therefore, boylove is not about [[child abuse]].


== Terms for boylove in other languages ==
== Terms for boylove in other languages ==

Revision as of 18:20, 7 December 2020

BLogo: The modern symbol of boylove.

Boylove, a concept whose origin can be traced back to Classical antiquity, is the word chosen by boylovers to describe the strong feelings of attraction and affection that certain adults feel towards boys. It is semantically equivalent to the term "pederasty", which is itself derived from the combination of the Greek words pais ("boy") and erastēs ("lover"; cf. eros). In ancient Greek homoerotic poetry, the noun paiderastēs and the verb paiderastein were replaced by paidophilēs and paidophilein (synonyms from which the term "pedophilia" originates), in order to fit the elegiac metre favored for the genre.[1] The word "boylove" was chosen in order to be applicable to both pedophiles and ephebophiles, as well as to avoid the negative connotations of the modern clinical term "pedophilia", and to more accurately define the exclusive focus of the attraction: male children and adolescents.

Boylovers commonly assert that boylove is a natural phenomenon that has existed throughout human history, fundamentally similar to currently accepted sexual orientations, a perspective they sustain by pointing out to the existence of customs of age-structured sexuality in different cultures and historical periods.

While boylove usually includes feelings of sexual and physical attraction to boys, boylove does not require, nor imply, sexual activity with boys. Boylove can be completely platonic, since the main concern of most boylovers is providing love and guidance to boys.

There is debate on the nature of boylove. There are some who believe boylove is simply a noun for adults who are emotionally and physically attracted to boys and that there are no particular guidelines or requirements to being a boylover besides having the attraction and an aversion to hurting boys. Others believe boylove, in addition to the attraction, denotes a set of beliefs and values related to the treatment of boys and that one must adhere to these expectations to be considered a boylover.[2] These values may include ideas such as boylovers should never expose boys to alcohol and drugs, that boylovers should never initiate sexual activities with boys, or even that boylovers should refrain from sex with boys in any case due to the risks involved for both parties. Universally accepted, however, is the idea that boylovers respect boys and do not hurt them. Therefore, boylove is not about child abuse.

Terms for boylove in other languages

  • Japanese: Shounen'ai (少年愛)

References

  1. K. J. Dover, Greek Homosexuality; Harvard University Press, 1989; p. 50.
  2. The Philosophy of Responsible Boylove

See also

External links

OLD LINK - SEEMS NOT TO FUNCTION (THE HYPOCRITES AT ARCHIVE.ORG SEEM TO HAVE DISABLED THE PAGE):
NEW LINK, TO ANOTHER ARCHIVED VERSION (PRESS "CONTROL + A" TO HIGHLIGHT THE TEXT FOR EASY READING: